Diigo is one of my favorite technology tools to use in my
classroom! I’ve been using this site for
over 3 years, and have yet to find a way that I can’t make it work with my
students! By signing up to have a
classroom version of Diigo (for free), I was able to create student accounts. Part of having student accounts is the
ability to share URL’s with students. As
an elementary teacher, this resource saves me countless hours in the
classroom. Rather than having the class
hand-enter every URL we wish to visit, and having them miss a letter or go to
the wrong site, Diigo allows me to ensure that my classroom is accessing the
correct site and information by the click of a button. For example, we do research projects every
year in which we use MEL and the databases linked through MEL as our primary
sources. Part of my students Diigo
accounts is the links to the 4 databases the class can use to access their
information. It’s a great way to ensure
that they are finding and using accurate information, and not a random website
they Google Search.
Another great aspect of Diigo is the ability to share links
with other staff. I have a group
established that I share with my peers.
They then, in return, use the links to integrate technology into their
rooms. Diigo also allows you to share links and join
groups with other educators – even those you might not know. I have joined countless Diigo groups that
allow me to extend my technology skills.
One of my favorite groups is the “Web 2.0 Tools For Teachers”
group. This group constantly updates new
and creative sites that I can incorporate into my classroom experience. I’d love to see my district use Diigo as a
way to share links and resources that fit the curriculum. We constantly find that when sitting in
district wide grade level meetings, that another teacher has encountered
something that fits perfectly into the curriculum. Diigo would be a great way to share those
resources, and always have them handy for easy access.
Our classroom text, Trends and Issues, really led to a great
reading on the definition change for the field of “educational technology”
usage – and I find myself relating more towards the current AECT definition
than the books. While I agree completely
with the books definition, especially the key component of the field of
instructional design and technology being “intended to improve learning and
performance in a variety of settings”, I feel that it misses the ever important
component the AECT definition hits: “Education technology is the study and
ethical practice of facilitating
learning and improving performance.” I
feel that my job as a teacher is to facilitate the students learning, not just
to improve their learning. As a teacher
I have the availability to use technology resources to take a student’s
thinking and deepen their understanding, not just improve how they are learning
the materials. I find it surprising that
they focus on the need to “improve human performance in the workplace” instead
of the need to help deepen the level of student thinking and learning. I’m curious to read further into the book and
see how my opinion changes!
(Feel free to check out my Diigo library! Click here or visit the post below)
Erica,
ReplyDeleteGreat idea using Diigo to get links out to students. I have been struggling finding a good way to do this for the last few years. I had never heard of Diigo before taking this class, but now maybe I will give it a try.
Hi Erica,
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I think you are spot on with your assessment and use of diigo, I definitely agree that refining a list of URLs is much more useful then sending students out into the great wide web and hope that they stumble upon something useful. I can also see the appeal for them in terms of wanting to create their own social bookmarks with their own particular spin on things, that they can then share with whole groups of family and friends. I wish I had been tuned into something like this many years ago, I know I have forgotten a ton of useful or just fun websites and now I don't have to have total recall. :)
Also, I too was a little concerned/disturbed with the editors' focus on business work-performance. Have a great week...
Juan